Juris Aktindsigt
Legal assessment of access-to-records requests
Juris Aktindsigt assesses every request with AI and prepares a proposal. Your team remains involved at every step and makes the decision.
The tool handles every kind of request under the Danish access-to-public-records rules, from a short citizen enquiry to a comprehensive press request.
More requests.Greater complexity.The same deadline.
The number of requests is growing, but staffing is not. Each case still requires a difficult legal assessment of exemptions, additional disclosure and data protection. Disclose too much or too little, and the authority risks criticism.
The same AI tools that can support casework also make comprehensive requests easier to draft and submit. The pressure is not disappearing. It is increasing.
This is what the legal assessment looks like in Juris Aktindsigt.
Juris Aktindsigt assesses the request step by step and proposes a conclusion with references to legislation and practice. Your team approves, changes or overrides it before the case continues.
expected reduction in working time in a Danish municipal AI project on access-to-records cases. Source: KL.
Less time on the first review. More time for legal judgement.
Read KL's assessmentInitial assessment
Juris reviews the complete rulebook at once.
Juris assesses identification, scope, competence, applicant type and possible grounds for refusal.
It separates the points that require your judgement from those that can already be resolved under legislation and practice.
Exemptions and additional disclosure
Every document receives its own assessment.
With Juris Aktindsigt, you assess which documents and information can be disclosed or exempted under sections 19–33 and 35, and where section 34 requires partial access.
Juris assesses additional disclosure under section 14 separately and pauses for your approval.
You make the decision. Juris Aktindsigt prepares the work.
The tool reads the material, identifies the legal questions and prepares a draft. You approve, change or override every material step.
The same structured workflow can be used by the caseworker, legal professional and responsible coordinator, with clear room for difficult judgements.
Built on legislation, practice and a comprehensive rulebook.
The rulebook contains the law used by the automation. It combines legal sources and practice with concrete assessment rules, and the authority can add its own documents and guidance.
- Act
- Danish Access to Public Administration Files ActIdentification, deadlines, exemptions in sections 19–33 and 35, partial access under section 34 and additional disclosure under section 14.
- Act
- Danish Public Administration ActIncluding referral when a request belongs with another authority.
- Practice
- Parliamentary OmbudsmanStatements and authority guidance linked to the specific cases.
- Practice
- Social Appeals Board and municipal supervisionRelevant supervisory practice forms part of the assessment basis.
- Rulebook
- Juris rulebook for access to recordsTurns legislation, practice, other external sources and internal guidance into a detailed workflow.
Documentation and supervision
Traceable from the first assessment to the response sent.
Juris attaches every AI assessment, approval and override to the case. The exact version of the rulebook remains part of the record.
You can document the process for an appeals body, supervisory authority or data-protection officer.
See Juris Aktindsigt on a concrete case.
Tell us briefly how you handle access-to-records requests today. We will walk through a case from request to response, focusing on your workflow and the legal assessments along the way.
We will contact you to find a suitable time. You can also email support@juris.legal directly.